Lets Get Cooking – learning power and the Co-Curriculum
June 25, 2012 Leave a comment

See how the Lets Get Cooking Programme utilises learning power in a Cumbria primary schools
Learning, changing and growing
June 25, 2012 Leave a comment

See how the Lets Get Cooking Programme utilises learning power in a Cumbria primary schools
May 19, 2012 Leave a comment
Howard Green talking about modelling schools as complex learning systems. Top level purpose is about creating sustainable learning systems. Core processes for this are leadership learning, teacher learning, student learning and com
munity learning. How do we develop rapid prototyping and feedback loops at all these levels in the organisation and how do we explore the relationships between learning at all these levels.
Learning is fractal – identity, authenticity and agency are key processes within a learning process. This works for schools as organisations as well as teachers, leaders and children. Going through the process of mode
lling is as important as the outcome – and learning from the evaluation of the prototype learning processes at all levels.
Using data to enhance learning for the individual, the organisation and the community. Complex data – quantitative, qualitative and narrative all captured for feedback to enhance learning.
The purpose of the school is to enhance learning and acheivement of students. The core processes through which that purpose is achieved are leadership learning, teacher learning and student learning. The challenge i.s to understand how these processes are fractal and inter-relate with each other
May 2, 2012 Leave a comment


Social learning analytics focus on how learners build knowledge in formal and informal relationships. Ubiquitous social media which is mostly off the radar for formal education – can we make it work for learning? There’s a huge amount of free and open content – how do we help people negotiate the information, filter it and select what they need? Living in the knowledge age…and we know what sort of skills are necessary. There’s also a growth in post-materialist values which fuels the democratisation of knowledge and social learning – or vica versa.
Network Analytics: identify individuals who support my learning, people with relevant interests, and origins of conflicts. Not interested in echo chambers…what sort of groups can support learning. OU has an intern working on network awareness….how can we tune SocialLearn to support networks.
Discourse Analytics: the ways in which learners engage in dialogue, with the ideas of others and how they relate those ideas to their own point of view and then explain it. Disputational dialogue, cumulative dialogue, exploratory dialogue. Using Elluminate chat to identify types of discourse.
Content Analytics: automated methods to examine, index and filter online media assets for learners. used to provide recommendations of resources tailed to he needs of an individual or group of learners. iSpot….capturing images to link to learning.
Dispositions Analytics: Dispositions can render visible the complex mix of experience, motivation and intelligence which make up an individuals capacity to engage in learning opportunities. EnquiryBlogger ELLIment.
Context Analytics: Seeks to understand the context of learning – and give you options which are relevant to your context at a particular place in time and space. A socialised analytic which shifts according to what people do with it.
Different Dashboard Views depending on who you are….teacher, learner, administrator….can we set them up so they make sense to the users. How can you develop them and present them usuably??
May 2, 2012 Leave a comment
There is a new level of interest in Learning Analytics across the world.
In particular there is a rapid development of Learning Analytics in the vendor space – everyone is repositioning their products around Learning Analytics. There are some distinct personality differences between vendors and researchers. The scope and scale of analytics includes the whole system – top down and bottom up. Educators in the classroom and policy makers/enterprise at a system level. At the classoom level it’s small data with low threshold tools. At the systems level its big data.
‘All embracing technique is in fact the consciousness of the mechanised world. Technique integrates everything.’ Jaques Ellul...
There is a research practice gap…we know much more about good quality education than we do in the classroom. There is an explosion int he term ‘the disruption of education’. Disruptive innovation……
Learning Analytics is interdisciplinary. Technical, pedagogical and social domains of learning must be brought into dialogue with each other so that interventions target the needs of all stakeholders. Holistic, integrated research. US Dept says the next five years will being an increase in models for collaboration between learning systems designers, researchers and educators.
a. development of new tools, techniques and people.
practitioner focused rather than research focused.
development of new techniques – more specific to the learning equation
capacity building in terms of people…academics, students, practitioners
what does a good learning analytics project look like?
b. data: openness, ethics, and scope
Protected IP will hinder iterative and rapid development of LA techniques
Integrate vendors in the LA community – many vendor driven innovations are not open, testable and improveable
Datasets for researchers and students, transparency, data ownership and access to analytics results, ability to customise
e.g. completion rates are a US centric problems.
ethics – what can we do, what can’t we do, what should students see…what should we see… how do we address this?
Scope of data capture….moving beyond learning management systems and digital only view of analytics.
Integration and usability – are you going to bring in all systems?
c. targets of analytics activity
the big point is ….so what? how can this support or enhance learning? the outcome of learning analytics is a question – leading to a diagnosis…and an intervention.
Enhancing learning and learning communities….
Anyone who can tell you what the future of education looks like is probably wrong…how can we create synergy dependably
d. connecting with other domains and disciplines
Questions???
What is the balance between computers and people?
What is the role of theory? Validate theory or theory emergence?
How will we know when we’ve been successful?
Research informed tools for analytics…and iterative cycle where research and practice improve each other and inform impact and dissemination
Can the LA community redefine learning processes and inform social change and social justice
November 29, 2010 1 Comment
This video was made by teachers and students in Gapuwyiak School in Arnhemland in Northern Territory to describe what they are learning in school this term, October 2010.
Check it out. It’s all about ideas getting out there and changing things – viral movements for social change
November 3, 2010 1 Comment
The third Learning Futures engagement pamphlet Drawing on two years of work with over forty schools, this pamphlet is the third publication from the Learning Futures programme. Here we examine what schools need to do in order to increase the authentic engagement of their students, and present findings that argue that schools themselves need to become more engaged – as learning communities, in learning outside school, in partnership with local communities and parents – if they are to see deeper engagement in their students.
I’m the lead researcher on this project and some of the key design principles are set out below:
Building on what we learned from year one, we can now identify several design principles which inform Learning Futures pedagogies. These aren’t rules and they don’t form a blue print – they are design principles. We like to work with the jazz metaphor for organisational and professional learning – here are some key harmonies and melodies which make the music distinctive, but each time a group plays, they produce something original and unique which reflects the context. All of the principles operate at three levels: the organisation as a whole, teacher practices and student experiences. A school is a complex adaptive system, where these principles are interdependent and together generate more than the sum of the individual parts. It’s down to each school to draw on their own wisdom and experience in how they co-generate their own learning at each of the three levels.
The main school level Learning Futures themes have been refined into:
Design principles for learning facilitators
A Language for learning: a rich language for learning through which we can talk about ourselves as learners and develop and own our own learning story.
Authenticity: the personal involvement of the learner in selecting a focus for their enquiry which has meaning and relevance to them in their lives beyond the classroom.
Active engagement: the production of discourse, products or performances that have relevance to learners beyond school and require more active engagement than simply repetition, retrieval of information and memorisation of facts or rules.
Enquiry: the co-construction of knowledge through disciplined enquiry which involves building on a prior knowledge base, striving for in-depth understanding and expressing findings through elaborated communication.
Coaching and Mentoring: learning relationships which are facilitative and empower the learner to take responsibility for their own learning over time.
Authentic assessment: both formative and summative which moves seamlessly between the personal and the public and is meaningful and real to the learner, their subject matter and their community.
Core elements of the student experience that seem to enable students to do enquiry well include:
The new Learning Futures pamphlet presents the big picture while the Learning Futures Evaluation Report 2010 unpacks more details. Both are now available on the learning futures website. This paper will also be a focus for the Professional Collaborative Enquiry masters unit offered at the University of Bristol in January.
August 22, 2010 Leave a comment
This powerpoint was made by Daniel, who is a teacher in Gappawiak school in Northern Territory. He was ‘translating’ the ideas and concepts of learning power into his own language and communicating this in the community. He has given permission for this video to be shown publicly.